Now that I have good growth conditions for GFAJ-1, I need to plan the rest of the work in more detail.
Frozen cell stocks: I'll want to start my phosphate-limited cultures with cells that have been pre-grown under phosphate-limited conditions, so that their subsequent growth will be limited by the phosphate in the medium, rather than by the phosphorus they have accumulated in RNA and other molecules. I have about 50 ml of dense culture in +P medium, so I'll wash these cells, resuspend them in a large volume of -P medium, and incubate them just until growth stalls**. To make monitoring easy I'll start the cultre at the final OD reached by my original -P culture; at this density I expect the cells to run out of phosphate within a few doublings.
(** I need to be careful that apparent cell density isn't being influenced by accumulation of poly-hydroxybutyrate, as it was in the Wolfe-Simon paper. So I'll also plate the cells to check that numbers are no longer increasing.)
Once I have a phosphate-limited culture I'll collect the cells (by filtration or centrifugation), resuspend them at high density, and freeze 1 ml aliquots of them in 15% glycerol. I'll check the cell density by plating before and after freezing, to make sure that freezing doesn't kill the cells.
DNA prep: I should have enough cells to also make my first DNA prep - if not I'll inoculate one of my freezer-stock tubes into a new overnight culture. I'll put this DNA through the same multiple purification steps I plan to use for DNA from arsenic-grown cells, checking the DNA concentration at each step, and running a gel to confirm the quality of the DNA and the absence of contaminating RNA. This will let me estimate the loss in each purification step, so I'll know how many cells I'll need for the arsenic-grown DNA prep.
Elemental analysis: I'll send aliquots of the media and some of the DNA to my collaborators, so they can check levels of phosphorus and arsenic. We can consider this to be our control DNA - if the DNA from arsenic-grown cells has no more arsenic than this DNA, we can conclude that arsenic-grown cells do not put arsenic into their DNA. It will be good to test this DNA now, as it sets the limit of detection we need for the arsenic-grown DNA.
However, when I purify the DNA from the arsenic-grown cells I'll also do a second control, by briefly incubating phosphate-grown cells in the arsenic medium before DNA purification. This will control for any carryover of arsenic in the DNA purification. If my purification is adequate I expect this DNA to have no more arsenic than the first control.
Strain identification: I'll give some of the DNA to the RA. She has the primers for the 16S rDNA amplification and will get it sequenced to confirm that these bacteria are GFAJ-1.
- Home
- Angry by Choice
- Catalogue of Organisms
- Chinleana
- Doc Madhattan
- Games with Words
- Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
- History of Geology
- Moss Plants and More
- Pleiotropy
- Plektix
- RRResearch
- Skeptic Wonder
- The Culture of Chemistry
- The Curious Wavefunction
- The Phytophactor
- The View from a Microbiologist
- Variety of Life
Field of Science
-
-
-
Political pollsters are pretending they know what's happening. They don't.5 weeks ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
Course Corrections6 months ago in Angry by Choice
-
-
The Site is Dead, Long Live the Site2 years ago in Catalogue of Organisms
-
The Site is Dead, Long Live the Site2 years ago in Variety of Life
-
Does mathematics carry human biases?4 years ago in PLEKTIX
-
-
-
-
A New Placodont from the Late Triassic of China5 years ago in Chinleana
-
Posted: July 22, 2018 at 03:03PM6 years ago in Field Notes
-
Bryophyte Herbarium Survey7 years ago in Moss Plants and More
-
Harnessing innate immunity to cure HIV8 years ago in Rule of 6ix
-
WE MOVED!8 years ago in Games with Words
-
-
-
-
post doc job opportunity on ribosome biochemistry!9 years ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Growing the kidney: re-blogged from Science Bitez9 years ago in The View from a Microbiologist
-
Blogging Microbes- Communicating Microbiology to Netizens10 years ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl12 years ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Lab Rat Moving House13 years ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs13 years ago in Disease Prone
-
-
Slideshow of NASA's Stardust-NExT Mission Comet Tempel 1 Flyby13 years ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
in The Biology Files
Not your typical science blog, but an 'open science' research blog. Watch me fumbling my way towards understanding how and why bacteria take up DNA, and getting distracted by other cool questions.
3 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Rosie,
ReplyDeleteDid you end up finding that you still didn't get growth in the Wolfe-Simon et al. medium, even after adding potassium? Could it be that you are just looking for higher yields? The amount of growth in Figure 1A from Wolfe-Simon et al. is pretty low. The amount you are getting with the phosphate amendment looks pretty high in the picture, but I can't gauge whether it is higher than an OD (680 nm) of ~0.25 (the highest OD reported in the paper).
In any case, I am excited to see whether you can get GFAJ-1 to grow on the glutamate-amended medium with arsenate instead of phosphate.
Thanks!
Oops, I meant to say "the amount you are getting with the phosphate AND glutamate amendments looks pretty high..." Sorry!
ReplyDeleteNo growth at all without an amino acid or agar; ODs less than 0.005. OD=~1.5 with glutamate!
ReplyDelete