I'm going to take advantage of my SMBE talk to proselytize for open science and research blogs.
The idea of open-access scientific publication is spreading. It's relatively easy for scientists to see the benefits of making the results of their research accessible to more people. But hardly anybody seems to consider the potential benefits of opening up the process of doing the science (as I'm trying to do with this blog). The reason is competition; most researchers are afraid that they'll be scooped if their competitors find out what they're doing.
Although competition can be a positive force in science, stimulating us to try to do better work than our competitors, I also think that the secrecy that arises from fear of competitors is also a very negative force. Competitors are all potential collaborators, and focus on competition shuts out the potential for collaboration. I was impressed by a NIH grant-writing workshop that told me that the first think NIH does when people call to ask about funding opportunities for a new line of investigation is to connect them with people doing related work, encouraging them to contact these as possible collaborators.
Of course it's easy for us, because we're working on a problem whose importance isn't widely recognized....
Field of Science
-
-
From Valley Forge to the Lab: Parallels between Washington's Maneuvers and Drug Development4 weeks ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Political pollsters are pretending they know what's happening. They don't.4 weeks ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
Course Corrections5 months ago in Angry by Choice
3 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'd love to read a transcript/see the slides of your talk, if there's a way you can share them.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of open science but the fear of competition is too great. I have been working to optimize the mating conditions for a species of Flavobacterium for almost a year and a half. I have succeeded recently in obtaining very high transformation efficiencies. Open science might have speed up my progress but I definitely have competitors. Some of whom have much more in the way of resources than I do.
ReplyDeleteHow selective are you in the information you share?
The slides won't really say anything about open science, except in that they'll show people where to find our blogs and grant proposals. But a previous commenter told me where I can post them, and I'll try to do that.
ReplyDeleteI don't think I'm selective at all, at least with respect to concerns about competition. And this openness brings benefits, which I'll try to post about explicitly sometime this week.