The Editor of BioEssays, Andrew Moore, has just posted several long comments (essay-length in total) about BioEssay's policies concerning blogs and other informal scientific communications. You'll find them at Zen Faulkes' excellent Neurodojo blog.
Dr. Moore's comments are very reassuring; BioEssays clearly recognizes the important contributions that post-publication peer review can make to peer-reviewed science.
Field of Science
-
-
-
Political pollsters are pretending they know what's happening. They don't.4 weeks ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
Course Corrections6 months ago in Angry by Choice
2 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good to hear. And two words for those people who think Peer-Review is the end-all-be-all in scientific review:
ReplyDeleteAndrew Wakefield
I think you may enjoy this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEx78SE1dEE
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete