Here's my plan for making the mutant strain knocked out for both HI0660 and HI0659:
I'll start with the two single-knockout plasmids that the RA made by recombineering. Both were made from the same parent plasmid containing a chromosomal segment (green) containing both genes and about 500 bp of flanking DNA on each side. In the left plasmid the HI0660 gene has been replaced by a SpcR cassette (orange). In the right plasmid the HI0659 gene has been replaced by the same cassette.
I'll cut both plasmids with the same two restriction enzymes. SpeI cuts in the vector, close to the left end of the insert, and SacII cuts in the SpcR cassette, close to its right end. Then I'll inactivate the enzymes (with heat or phenol extraction), mix the two digested DNAs, ligate the mixture and transform it into E. coli, selecting for AmpR and maybe SpcR.
The single fragments won't be able to self-ligate because the enzymes give different sticky ends, but 10 different bi-molecular ligation products are possible. The plasmid I want (A+D) is shown below. Three of the others won't be able to replicate (A+A, A+C, C+C), and three others will contain inverted duplications of the vector (B+B, B+D, D+D) and thus probably be unstable; they'll also be much larger than A+D and not SpcR. The other unwanted combinations will also be larger than A+D (A+B, C+D and B+C) so I should be able to easily distinguish them.
Once I identify the plasmid I want I'll just transform our wildtype H. influenzae strain with its insert DNA and select for SpcR. Then I can find out whether deleting HI0660 eliminates the need for HI0659.
Field of Science
-
-
TMI Friday: Taking it to third base ..literally1 day ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
-
-
-
-
A New Non-mammaliaform Eucynodont from the Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina4 days ago in Chinleana
-
Countries with a state religion also have fewer political and civil freedoms5 days ago in Epiphenom
-
-
Chemistry, fluid dynamics and an awful radioactive mess1 week ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Exploding expertise1 week ago in The Culture of Chemistry
-
-
-
-
-
-
Social entrepreneurs in India: Water for all4 weeks ago in The Allotrope
-
-
UPDATED: 10 things we need to find out about the #NCoV1 month ago in Rule of 6ix
-
-
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl11 months ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 year ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images1 year ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved1 year ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House1 year ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs1 year ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea2 years ago in The Greenhouse
Not your typical science blog, but an 'open science' research blog. Watch me fumbling my way towards understanding how and why bacteria take up DNA, and getting distracted by other cool questions.
3 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



what about gel-purification?!
ReplyDeleteGel purifying fragments A and D (before ligating them) would increase my chances of getting the plasmid I want, but I'm lazy so I might first try ligating the whole mixture. I'd be betting that the gel purification would be more work than the plasmid screening, but I could easily be wrong.
ReplyDelete"plasmid screening" involves at least running a gel. so yes, you are wrong.
ReplyDelete