The GFAJ-1 cells I streaked on a plate of my less-than-specified culture medium are growing, and much faster than I had dared hope. After less than 48 hr I can already see tiny (very tiny) colonies. I can't estimate growth rate because I don't know how many cells are the colony,
I was worried that they might not grow at all, because this medium doesn't include the trace-element mix that Wolfe-Simon et al. added to their medium. Instead I simply made up the medium with lovely Vancouver tap water. It also doesn't include most of the vitamins they added - I only had stocks of thiamine and pantothenic acid, so they were the only vitamins I added.
I'm still considering solutions to the cell-counting problem. Flow cytometry of acridine-orange-stained cells won't work very well because some of the cells are in small clumps of 2-10 cells. Collecting known volumes of cells onto black filter membranes would probably work fine but would be a pain and use a lot of the filters. I think the simplest solution is to make a 2-X acridine orange stock that contains a known density of 2 µ polystyrene beads, mix this with an equal volume of culture, and then count both the beads and the cells in random microscope fields-of-view. I'm going to test this now.
Field of Science
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Even Earlier Discovery of Antibiotic Resistance1 day ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Religion is halfway between a fact and an opinion - according to kids and adults2 days ago in Epiphenom
-
Bioengineers go retro to build a calculator from living cells3 days ago in The Allotrope
-
-
A New Non-mammaliaform Eucynodont from the Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina1 week ago in Chinleana
-
-
Chemistry, fluid dynamics and an awful radioactive mess1 week ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Exploding expertise2 weeks ago in The Culture of Chemistry
-
-
-
-
-
UPDATED: 10 things we need to find out about the #NCoV1 month ago in Rule of 6ix
-
-
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl11 months ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 year ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images1 year ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved1 year ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House1 year ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs1 year ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea2 years ago in The Greenhouse
Not your typical science blog, but an 'open science' research blog. Watch me fumbling my way towards understanding how and why bacteria take up DNA, and getting distracted by other cool questions.
5 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have used Tween 20 to help un-stick cells for counting. It was for flow cytometry, but may also work for microscopy. My cells were fixed in gluteraldehyde and are 2-3um.
ReplyDeleteElyse, how much Tween 20 can be used? I tried 0.01% and it didn't make any difference.
ReplyDeleteBased on this post and a previous one it sounds like you're going to try and reproduce FWS' data using different media. If so, won't differences in media be a possible source of any differences in GFAJ-1 behavior that you observe? It seems to me that if you're going to go to the trouble to try and repeat their results you'd do everything as close to what they did as possible.
ReplyDelete@anonymous: You're absolutely right. The RA gets back from vacation tomorrow (from the South of France) and I'm going to have her order all the missing vitamins. (Pathetically, I don't know how to order them myself...)
ReplyDeleteWe use 0.05% for fixed cells.
ReplyDelete